🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising number of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that smartphones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to pass a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for minors unless guardian approval is granted. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid first step," said a leading European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after viewing harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills requiring adult authorization for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to copy the Australian lead, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that policymakers globally are no longer content to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.