🔗 Share this article

An activist group has claimed to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to publish them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Industry experts said the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of metadata such as performer and record names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, confirmed that the breach did not represent its full catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorized access found a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of sharing large data files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

A composer and campaigner for defending artists’ copyright, remarked the leaked music would likely be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated data is sadly common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site makes references to LibGen, a huge online archive of pirated books that has allegedly been used by Meta to train its systems.

A founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own personal free equivalent of Spotify”. He added it could also allow tech companies to “train on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a key issue between artists, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize protected work without consent unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and development told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.